Your research deserves better than a grammar checker.

Grammarly catches typos. It does not know that "we did a comparison" should be "we compared" in academic English. It does not know that "the treatment was done" needs an agent — "the treatment was administered by the clinician." It does not understand hedging conventions — that "this proves" should be "this suggests" when discussing observational data.

These are not grammar errors. They are register, convention, and usage patterns specific to scientific English — and they are the reason reviewers write "the manuscript requires language editing by a native speaker" in their reports. Severe enough, and language quality becomes a driver of desk rejection before the manuscript ever reaches a reviewer.

PeerReviewAI's ESL editing pass is built specifically for these patterns.

Every ESL correction appears as a tracked change in your Word document — color-coded separately from the journal-formatting edits your Peer Review generates when you select a target journal. Your review also gains a dedicated Language Quality section. You see exactly what was changed, and you decide whether to accept each correction.

This is not just editing — it is a learning tool. Over time, you start recognizing the patterns and making the corrections yourself before submission.

Professional human English editing for scientific manuscripts typically costs $200–$500 with 3–7 day turnaround; premium services can run over $1,000. PeerReviewAI delivers targeted ESL editing for $19.99 as an add-on to Peer Review — with results in minutes.